`5. As far as I am aware, the lawyers (of the First Defence Council) in Scotland, Mr McSparran McCormick, on behalf of the (First Defence Counsel) have made at least two representations to the Scottish Legal Aid Board and have emphasised that the prosecution`s action against the (First Defence Counsel). erred in law and these lawyers challenged the adequacy of the legal aid granted to the applicant. 4.3 Had the application for legal aid not been accepted, an appeal would have been lodged. At the time of notification, valid objections were raised (on which I comment below) which were ultimately not accepted. Legitimate objections, even if rejected, are crucial in deciding whether it would be fair and equitable to receive an award from the Fund now. 8. Given that the persecutor waived her action and that the (first counsel) had to defend itself in this respect and that legal costs were incurred and that the Court refused to pay the costs in favour of (first counsel) against the persecutor, it seems to me that an arbitral award in favour of (first counsel) against the Scottish Legal Aid Board, who financed the prosecution`s action, only and fairly. Portal changed the login page? Please contact us and one of our moderators will replace him as soon as possible. Step 2: Enter your AmazonSecure ID correctly. If you can see the password, use it when no one else is around, as people may look over your shoulder and try to steal your passwords.

The Legal Aid Pension Scheme (Scotland) provides occupational pension schemes to members of the Scottish Legal Aid Board and its employees. The system works “by analogy” with the NHS Superannuation Scheme (Scotland). This essentially means that, although the scheme is a separate legal entity, it adopts its rules and regulations from the NHS scheme (Scotland) – although there are some exceptions which are specifically mentioned in the Legal Aid Pension Scheme (Scotland) Regulations 2010. Employee satisfaction surveys showed that 89% of employees who participated in the studies said they enjoyed working for the company, up from 67% the previous year; And 87% agreed that the board had created a good work-life balance for employees, compared to 53% in 2001. The Scottish Legal Aid Board is the public body outside the Department responsible for the administration of legal aid in Scotland and accountable to the Scottish Executive. It was established in 1987 by the Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 1986. Legal aid offers help with legal problems to people who otherwise could not afford it. While these measures showed reduced costs and improved morale, Williamson also knew that productivity and performance measures were increasing across the board. At a time when the company had managed to reduce overtime costs by 45%, customer satisfaction was higher and more cases were processed in less time. One team traditionally suffered from low morale and not all members were interested in volunteering for the project. “They said, `Why should we plan our time?` Williamson remembers. But the team increased their productivity by 25% and “loved” working flexibly.

Public contact hours were maintained at the previous office hours: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., but to accommodate flexible work schedules, council staff agreed to have offices open weekdays from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. and Saturdays from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. Employees could work at any time during these hours with the consent of their teammates, as long as they worked an average of 35 hours per week and ensured that service was not compromised. To enable the organization to recognize routine duties as part of its new working conditions, Williamson says further developments in work systems and processes, as well as additional support and equipment for employees, will be needed for the organization to conduct due diligence. Now, another project needs to be put in place to ensure that this is officially promoted. The informal continuation of homework would have meant that the council ran the risk that it would become an implicit condition of workers` contracts. As a result, the option of working from home has been removed from the formalized flexible work program, although the business case continues to be reviewed.

3.1 As a result of the appointment of defence counsel in this action, the (first defence counsel) experienced financial difficulties, as he had to spend a great deal of time investigating cases and appointing a lawyer. [21] With respect to the fair and equitable test, the basis was that the original advocates were charities; the detailed letter of opposition which they had sent to SLAB when examining the applicant`s application for legal aid and the fact that, in view of the nature of the appeal and the amount requested, they had no choice but to participate in the proceedings. The results of the first pilot projects made expansion of the program almost inevitable. With approval from the organization`s directors and board of directors — chief executive Lindsay Montgomery called the program an “outstanding success” in a report to the CIO — Williamson planned a second phase of testing to involve the entire organization. According to her, this would allow the company to see if the productivity gains of the teams of the first phase could be maintained and replicated throughout the workforce. The provision of free legal aid in Scotland is based on the Poor`s Roll of 1424:[2] There is a clear requirement for all employees, including part-time workers, to adopt lists as part of their working time. The guidelines also provide guidance on specific issues such as compliance with the Working Time Regulation, the application of the board`s requirement of at least 30 minutes of meal breaks and the restriction of the use of annual leave to repay time debts, all of which were recorded as demands of human resources staff during the second phase. 5. Initial objections to the application for legal aid In March 2002, the Council consisted of 16 pilot teams totalling 154 people testing a combination of flexible working models. These included: Neither government agencies nor the legal profession are likely to appear on the lists of most HR practitioners from sectors known for their radical employment practices. However, the Scottish Legal Aid Board covers both categories and has taken the bold step of effectively abolishing its fixed contractual working hours to give its 330 employees the opportunity to choose their own working patterns. The final report was sent to the Executive Board team in December 2004 with the recommendation to formalize self-planning and extension of hours of operation throughout the organization starting in 2005.

This was accepted, and in February of this year, Williamson held workshops for managers and directors to ensure they were satisfied with the program. In the meantime, she wrote the final guide for all employees, which was finally published in April. 2. Before making an order under this Division, the court shall consider awarding a seizure of costs to counsel. Building occupancy data showed that few employees worked after 7 p.m. and only five people were regularly working after 7:30 p.m. From the beginning of April, weekday consultation hours, which had already been completed from 9 p.m. to 8 p.m. at the end of the first phase, were further reduced to 7.30 p.m.

M. Williamson says that in addition to reducing the cost of facilities such as heating and lighting, the change helps the board recruit and retain security personnel who can leave a little early. [45] With respect to paragraph 19(3)(c), since the first counsel does not meet the test set out in paragraph (b), I need not make a final statement on this issue. However, I would like to make two general observations, namely: first, I consider that, in examining this criterion, it is relevant to take into account the circumstances in which legal aid was granted and, in particular, whether objections were raised against the granting of legal aid by the party seeking the order and, Secondly, I also consider it relevant to take into account, when examining this criterion: whether the party applying for legal aid had no choice but to initiate proceedings. The Scottish Legal Aid Board (SLAB) is a public body of the Scottish Government responsible for the administration of legal aid. It was established in April 1987 under the Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 1986[1] and took over the functions previously performed by the Law Society. The council`s 330 employees range from lawyers and accountants to post and security staff, handling around 400,000 grants for legal aid and dealing with over £150 million in net expenditure each year. Almost all employees work at the Edinburgh headquarters. “The second phase was always more difficult because we had to open it up to everyone,” Williamson said. While she informed all employees about the project through regular updates in the board`s internal magazine, for some of the uninvolved teams, it was “something happening elsewhere.” .